Publications & Resources

Get insights and guidance from MLMIC and other leading sources on medical professional liability, risk management, and more.

Tag: legal perspective

The Verdict: The Fine Line: A Department of Health Investigation and the Patient-Physician Relationship

In this two-part episode of The Verdict, attorney Jonathan Erman joins host Tammie Smeltz to unpack Department of Health investigations and the role of the patient-physician relationship.

The Scope: Navigating the Pitfalls of Patient Texting

MLMIC is excited to debut the first combined issue of The Scope for both medical and dental providers. The Q3 2025 edition explores the risks of patient texting, a credentialing case study, a dental case gone wrong and more.

The Scope: Navigating the Pitfalls of Patient Texting

MLMIC is excited to debut the first combined issue of The Scope for both medical and dental providers. The Q3 2025 edition explores the risks of patient texting, a credentialing case study, a dental case gone wrong, and more.

Undiagnosed Oral Cancer and a Faulty EDR System

MLMIC’s latest case study shows how a faulty EDR system and delayed follow-up led to a missed oral cancer diagnosis — underscoring the need for strong documentation, vigilance and timely referrals.

Case Study: When Standing Orders are Disregarded

MLMIC’s latest case study shows how disregarding standing physician orders during post-operative care led to reinjury, infection concerns, additional procedures and ultimately litigation.

Open Bar: Indemnification Clauses and Liability Insurance Coverage

As physician contracts become more complex, indemnification clauses are showing up more frequently — and not all are created equal. This month’s Open Bar explains how these clauses can affect liability exposure and why physicians should always review them with both legal counsel and their liability carrier.

Case Study: An Unaddressed Language Barrier

An unaddressed language barrier and lack of documented informed consent resulted in a malpractice lawsuit and settlement after a routine extraction led to complications.

Case Study: Body Dysmorphia – Initial Treatment

A 49-year-old woman with a history of multiple cosmetic procedures sought a midfacial lift she felt had not been corrected by a prior facelift. Despite a well-documented informed consent process and an initially smooth recovery, her dissatisfaction escalated. What followed raised concerns of body dysmorphic disorder and ultimately led to a lawsuit.

Open Bar: Handling Arons Interview Requests from Attorneys

Treating physicians may receive attorney requests to discuss a patient’s condition, even if they’re not named in a lawsuit. Known as Arons interviews, these requests require a specific patient authorization and follow strict legal guidelines. In this month’s Open Bar, MLMIC experts are breaking down when and how to respond to these requests so you can navigate the process confidently.

Open Bar: Handling Arons Interview Requests from Attorneys

Treating physicians may receive attorney requests to discuss a patient’s condition, even if they’re not named in a lawsuit. Known as Arons interviews, these requests require a specific patient authorization and follow strict legal guidelines. In this month’s Open Bar, MLMIC experts are breaking down when and how to respond to these requests so you can navigate the process confidently.